DOSSANI TRAVELS PVT. LTD. versus TRAVELS SHOP (PVT.) LTD.
Article 199 Hajj Policy, 2013 High Court Constitutional Jurisdiction Options, Tractotomy of Options, Hajj Group Organizers' Choice Rule (HGOs) The High Court in its constitutional jurisdiction selects Haj Group Organizers (HGOs). Ordered to select by bidding process. There was a violation of the tracheotomy of powers, which directed the selection of Hajj group organizers through the bidding process in the Constitutional High Court's core constitutional jurisdiction, and the test set out in the Hajj policy was substituted. Was given. Without hearing the Hajj group organizers / appellants and other persons from the Ministry of Religious Affairs who had already been allocated quota and made arrangements for the intention of Hajj, which was not enforceable in law, under Article 199 of the Constitution, The order could have been canceled or the policy produced by the executive, if it was a violation of the constitution, was the result of LAW or economic rumors, but in the present case nothing has been put before the court which shows this. The challenge is that the Hajj policy has faced any kind of weakness. The Supreme Court has directed that the ministry continue to regulate religious affairs. In the light of a fair and transparent policy, appeals were allowed every year in accordance with the guidelines set by the Supreme Court in Hajj, registration, registration and quota allocation and detailed decision.
