Find a Lawyer

RIAZ HUSSAIN SHAH versus THE STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) S 7 Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), Sections 494 and 561A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Act 1974 established by the Special Court under the pressure of terrorist activities. Allowed legal proceedings under High court could withdraw case against accused: Special court order was set aside and special court ordered the matter to be considered as funding: Appeal of the accused to decide according to law He was found to have contemplated his contempt order passed by the district magistrate. Valid 494 million PCs were correct because the PC remained intact even after the declaration of the Act of 1975 suppressing terrorism. The order passed by the special court was finalized and there was no provision for automatic intervention by the Cisco Court. S7 of the Terrorist Activities Act, 1975: Terminated the High Court jurisdiction and could not be prosecuted automatically and the provisions of Section 561A, CRPC may be invoked for the purpose of guarantee and otherwise The other Supreme Court stopped it. The proceedings of the High Court order during the hearing of the appeal on the accused's furnishing bond etc. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Nilam lawyer