MUHAMMAD ISMAIL versus THE STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 514 Contempt of Court Act (LX1V of 1976), forfeiture of Section 3 bond since the accused was granted bail by the High Court and bail was granted and the title documents were submitted to the High Court. The trial court was responsible for sending the matter to the High Court for appropriate action in connection with the confiscation of the surety bond, but instead, the trial court canceled the bail and canceled the bond. The order was approved, however, the order of the trial court to regulate the aforesaid section pursuant to section 14, CCPS. Under the guidance of the new order, but the trial court had passed an order to the last order without court order and without using your mind as to ensure within. The jurisdiction of the contempt of court High Court, however, was upheld by the trial court's injunction with negligence and reluctance, and its heirs were allowed to submit the title documents.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Chak Sawara lawyer