Find a Lawyer

ABDUL HANNAN PASHA versus M.C.

Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Section 15 In the payment of rent the default one received notice of the death of the landlord and his heirs were the new house. Which could have been accidental. Or in a deliberate position and in the first round of litigation by the current controller that he had brought to the Supreme Court level, however, such condolences only to the decision of the preceding matter. Could have been sustained or if the wrongful decision had been taken, the first appeal in the matter was pending before the matter or, respectively, by that time the Supreme Court had earlier decided the case of eviction, on behalf of the tenant. No further scope was available to complain. Should have corrected its chartered wrong course by submitting a rent on the wrong name with complete information about the new title holders from the beginning, the names of the successors of the landlord were always known to the tenant as acceptable. , Which were actually part of the record. Courts could not, of course, maintain default judgments. The circumstances of the case cannot guarantee any further flexibility. The refusal of the tenant to evacuate was ineffective as eviction was ordered on the same basis. female advocates from Head Marala lawyer