Find a Lawyer

RUBINA SHARIF versus ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199 The final and effective order of residence allotment to the public servants according to its entitlement was approved in the initial period in favor of the public servant (defendant) on the basis of the statement of the State Officer and Law Officer. ? The property in question was allotted by the officials and allotted to the civil servants as per the directions of the High Court and for some time extended by the officers for the grant of vacant possession, in the meantime the applicant was likewise Allotted, and directed by the High Court to be retained, the government was bound by the statement of its workers that the resident, under this question, was allotted to a public servant (respondent) Knowing the option, the House would not be questioned, for which it was allotted. Government employee and such order has been maintained by the High Court in the first period of litigation I was not part of the pool of available houses when the applicant's High Court order was granted after the initial period of litigation. This was done when the final consent request (respondent) against the allotment of the employee was also received. Misunderstanding Because no writ can be issued against the order of the High Court under Article 199 of the Constitution, the preliminary order of the High Court under which the applicant, without any legal authority and without legal effect, under which the civil The allotment order in favor of the servant was confirmed that the constitutional application of the field petition would be pending, requesting that the occupied houses be kept in possession. solicitors from Manga Mandi lawyer