Find a Lawyer

BASHIR AHMAD versus NAZIR AHMAD

The review of the first decision of the West Pakistan Board of Revenue Ordinance, Section 13 of the West Pakistan Board of Revenue Act of 1960 (XI of 1957), Section 8 of the Board of Revenue, which resulted in the dismissal of the applicant's revision record. It is indicated that the consolidation officer had prepared earlier. The Stability Scheme whereby they kept the co-owners' accounts as Joint Stability Officers and later modified the scheme and created a new scheme that was completely inadequate for the Stability Officer and It was legally unheard of for the officer, followed by a stabilization officer later canceled by the scheme. False because this is the Ultimate Wire of the Stabilization Officer's powers, then the consent of all the schemes was mandatory which resulted in the reduction of the scheme. In the fact that the parties later made the decision after making the decision. Revision to the Board of Revenue was not grounded again See Applicant failed to prove any significant new material knowledge record or any apparent error appearing in the face of discovery not previously known to applicant That could not be presented because of circumstances beyond his control or for any other good reason. Section 8, the provisions contained in the West Pakistan Board of Revenue Act, 1957, may be summoned because they were not eligible for review. power of attorney advocate Mustang lawyer