Find a Lawyer

KHALIL AHMAD versus RIAZ BIBI

Against Marriage Deduction / Plaintiff (Husband) on the basis of Section 5 of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 and the exercise of the right of puberty and marriage to the Plaintiff (Husband) on the exercise of their right of puberty The lawsuit alleges dissolution of the marriage. And Khulla was able to prove through unconvincing testimony of natural evidence that he had forcibly married defendant. That she never accepted a marriage. The defendant was a very old man. And this defendant had made false accusations of adultery against his plaintiff, in which case he had a natural hatred against the defendant, because the accused's father allegedly kept his hand in marriage. In view of the specific amount paid by the defendant who was not a party to the transaction, the defendant could not be held liable for his return, as there was no agreement between the parties in the marriage. There was no question of adjudication on the incident, as the plaintiff subsequently contracted a second marriage trial, however In fact, the marriage was properly dissolved and the trial court's decision could not be interfered with pakistani advocates Jhand lawyer