PAKISTAN PULP PAPER AND BOARD MAKERS ASSOCIATION versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Legislative Counsel, Constitutional Request for Authority under Article 3 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 114 Return of Production Capacity Procedure and Implementation of Monitoring Clearance Procedure During approval, the letter said the Authority is considering the decision to collect Central Excise Duty under the Capacity Tax procedure instead of the duty on actual production under the Supervision Clearance Scheme, after withdrawing the constitutional application. If her interest is badly affected in the future, she reserves the right to make a constitutional petition. After the withdrawal of the constitutional petition, the applicants were informed that the eligibility tax would be discontinued from the due date after which the goods would be cleared under the supervision clearance procedure Undertaking given to the court and the applicants, I will develop a side scheme The new tax scheme does not reflect the factual capabilities of the factories. Such a scheme does not show that after hearing the applicants, the authority has decided in a fair manner on such matters. No justification was given that he was one-sided Rely on the approval be withdrawn at any monitoring process. Previously, the applicants granted to the court in the constitutional petition had the right to press in the service doctrine of promissory stoppel against the under-authority given by the authority, as well as the concrete conclusions attached to the constitutional petition and documents. Which was picked up by the applicants. Excise duty imposed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near FR Peshawar lawyer