Find a Lawyer

TRUSTEES OF THE PORT OF KARACHI versus MIAN AHMED

Port Authority Lands and Buildings (Occupation Recovery) Ordinance 1962 Section 87 and 3 Port Authority Lands and Buildings (Recovery of Occupation Ordinance XII of 1932), Sections 3, 4 and 9 Civil Procedure Code (of 1), OV1I , R11 and Section 115 Lease cancellation for breach of the terms and conditions of the lease proceeding, by notice issued to cancel the lease plot for fulfillment of any part of the compensation (plaintiff). Rejects the request to challenge the attestation of this notice authority without the consent of the plaintiff. Plaintiff was dismissed by the trial on the basis that the jurisdiction of the court was restricted but it was reinstated by the lower appellate court. The plaintiff admitted in his claim to the plaintiff that he Has committed the pledge by withdrawing from the post and contributing to the portion of the leased plot. The notice of violation of the lease agreement was noticeable to the plaintiff and the same was issued by the competent authority authorized to issue the same, issued by the officer authorized by the Notice under Section 3, Port Authority's Land and Buildings (Recovery) Ordinance, 1962. Was to go but in the meantime the plaintiff had filed a court order ruling on the status of the state. Article 3 of the Ordinance allowed the plaintiff to issue a notice, the jurisdiction of the civil court was barred from rendering a decision on the dispute issue, the trial was properly held by the lower appellate court. Was rejected and thus not guaranteed. Responsible for putting the plates aside in the suit, the circumstances were rejected tax advocates from Upper Dir lawyer