SAEEDA BANO versus MUHAMMAD AMIN
Section 497 (5) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/334/324 / 337F / 148/149 guarantees were found in the termination of the accused. The law was defamatory because the sessions court, without accepting the merits of this case, allowed it to bail on the basis that the case against the complainant seems to be of two versions, thus section 497 (2). , The CR PC complaint was filed after considerable delay when the presence of witnesses was hurt and their presence could not be disputed. The specific role of the accused was attributed to what was found appropriate during the police investigation, therefore, there was a belief that the accused was involved in a case under the prohibition clause of section 497, the CCP Bull said. Permission was revoked in some cases
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Malakwal lawyer