BARKAT ULLAH SIDDIQUE versus SAMIR-UN-NISA
Dispute relating to transfer of plot in question of vacant property and IDPs Act (1975) Section 2 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), moved in favor of the respondents in the interest of the respondents' constitutional application. Was. Against such allotment on this land, he had already excluded some part of the property transferred to him which stated that the plot did not become part of the property with the applicant at any stage. ? Such an affiliation with another person (alien of litigation) can thus not be claimed for the first time before the transfer order in favor of the transfer of the Supreme Court that he was never in possession of the pending plot, therefore, Applicant's stance The portion of the property transferred to him by the plot had already been transferred to him, the record in question was against the order, excluding the applicant \ Constitutional application was unimaginable and in it The leave to appeal was denied in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Sakrand lawyer
