Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

NAZIR AHMAD versus GHULAM MUSTAFA


Civil Procedure Code Order XXI O XXI, R35 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the issuance of CPC decree and injunction requiring the plaintiff to amend the plaintiff during the execution, under which the courts Failure to apply his mind to the plaintiff's modification of the plaintiff during the execution proceedings and that he did not deserve relief in any way because the amendment changed the color of the suit was taken before the High Court. And it was overturned on the grounds that the lower courts had done enough to allow the plaintiff to amend. No weakness or legal defect was identified in the judgment of the Justice High Court to guarantee interference on the same leave so that the appeal was refused.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Khanewal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.