SHAFCO INTERNATIONAL versus CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION CORPORATION, ISLAMABAD
Article 199 tender of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 was terminated by the department for non-fulfillment of its requirements, including the applicant's tender. The latest tenders were sought up to the due date as the applicant challenged such tendering in the constitutional application that he was entitled to a contract on the account. The first tender and he did not file a fresh tender applicant before the High Court stating that he could be allowed to attend the tenders proposed to be opened on a fixed date, as he was not in the constitutional petition. The payer may not be allowed to participate in the tender. So far, any such application is not allowed to participate in the tenders, nor can it be considered that before the admission of the constitutional application and even because the tenders Was invited to receive and due date did not choose to participate because of its own default applicant. , And such tender haven expired, if the department allows anyone, including the applicant, to participate in the tender, it (the department) violates its advertising terms, and in this case The governing rules could have taken part in the new tenders, but if they chose not to do so, they were held liable for violating the terms and conditions for submitting the tenders. ?
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
