Find a Lawyer

REHMAT SHAH versus AMIR GUL

West Pakistan Citizens Rental Ordinance 1959 Section 14 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and 199 premises Fresh request for eviction of tenant as per personal requirement: Compliance tenant objection that earlier dismissal request Was dismissed under section 14 of the Ordinance was banned; the courts below have submitted that the landlord, with fresh cause of action, may file a new evacuation request, followed by the petition. Was not prohibited under the provisions of section 14, West. Pakistan Citizens Rent Restriction Ordinance, 1959 Respondent (one of the landlords) who needed land to be located, since he was retired and unemployed, no evidence has been brought on record that He or she had a son employed or in the possession of another. The finding of two authorized forums in the premises in the same area stating that the landlord needs premises for personal necessity was not available in the constitutional jurisdiction before the High Court. Any weakness in the High Court decision. Was not identified but the leave of appeal was denied in the constitutional jurisdiction for refusing to interfere with the coordination of competent forums. top civil advocates from Wazirabad lawyer