RAFI-UD-DIN versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE
RNA of Pakistan (1973), Decision of the Art 212 Service Tribunal One of the members of the service tribunal who heard the appeal did not participate in the decision due to his exchange, which the other two members of the service tribunal declared. What was Appeals may continue despite the absence of a member and a decision may be made in the view of the majority, but the decision of the service tribunal was required to show the absent member, so that he could express his views in this matter. Provide the opportunity. Anyone, and the same record that all the members of the service tribunal have heard on the case, should agree on the order of the individual regardless of the differences and in this case the legal provision made pursuant to the R24 Punjab Terms of Service. Each point has to be decided. Tribunal (Regulation) Roots, 1975 Such procedure was not resorted to, the decision presented by the service tribunal was set aside, the leave application for appeal was changed to appeal and the service tribunal remanded it. It was obtained to show the absent member so that he could have an opportunity to express his views.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Ali Chak lawyer