Find a Lawyer

OUTAB-UD-DIN versus PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 38 (3) (a) and 35 Payments Act (IV of 1936), valid jurisdiction of the Section 17 Labor Appellate Tribunal, under the Labor Payment Act, 1936, the Labor Court was preferred. , Whether the Labor Appellate Tribunal extends any case or proceeding under the Industrial Appeal Tribunal Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, where wage payment, under the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, and the Revised Jurisdiction of the Labor Appellate Tribunal. Under the Act, any appeal is decided by a labor court. , 1936, was also found to have been a case decided by the Labor Court under the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, and then amended under Article 38 of the Ordinance, S: 35, Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969. Under the settings of the Labor Appellate Tribunal shall be viable. That the Labor Court shall also have jurisdiction over matters which are the powers assigned by it to be exercised by the Labor Court. Any other law; thus, adopted and awarded under the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, has resulted in an appeal passed by the Labor Court in an appeal under Section 17, the Salary Payment Act, 1936. Orders, Section 38, qualify for labor appellate tribunal jurisdiction under the Industrial Relations Ordinance. As a general rule relating to labor matters in 1969, if a forum established under a common law was granted power under a particular law, by exercising powers under the special law, Such forums work in their usual jurisdiction ( criminal advocate from Doltala lawyer