SAIRA versus ZONAL MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
Fatal Accident Act 1855 Section 1 Death of a defendant due to negligence and negligence Two children who were playing at the defendants' school grounds whose walls were broken in various places, the gate was open and the school premises were closed. There was no watchman duty at the gates, while playing fell into the water tank and the defendant's exemption claimant's responsibility sank, that when a fatal accident occurred at the school, he did not start working and that some The contractors who were building the building were subordinate to the building, which did not prove to be absent. In this regard, the general course of evidence required the defendants to provide security and protection, such as raising a fence around the tank or keeping a guard through a guard or closing the school premises so that the children of the neighborhood could reach it as well. Don't have access. If children are treated voluntarily by coming to the water tank and suffering death, the duty is also imposed by the occupants to provide such protection, because of the child's death, they are negligent and negligent of the defendants. Are responsible for the accident and the loss of children's heritage.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Hasilpur lawyer