Find a Lawyer

NOOR ELAHI versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, SARGODHA

West Pakistan Sovereign Establishment of immovable property (declaration of unlawful occupants) Ordinance 1965 Section 122 Punjab sovereign institution immovable property (removal of unauthorized occupiers) Ordinance (XXXVII of 1965), section 3 Civil procedure code of 1908 (1908) ), O. VII, R11 and Section 115 were dismissed in their first case for applicant / property declarations on the basis that the applicants 'position was that the applicants' appeal was also dismissed, Respondents' response to the move was rejected by the High Court stating that they would submit appropriate notices. Section 122, terms of the Punjab Local Government Ordinance, 1979 and the immovable property of Punjab sovereign bodies (removal of unauthorized occupants) Ordinance, section 3 of 1965 were declared licensed by the High Court in the first period of litigation. And final applicants were received upon receipt of this decision. Respondents \ Search notice of possession of property in possession, filing another case for declaration of effect against them, with no jurisdiction, was illegal and ineffective on their rights. , The applicants were once again disputed by their own conduct that they were not only paying a written base fee but in the first period of litigation it was recognized that the applicants had to take a contradictory position. Cannot be allowed, especially when the results found in the first review were finalized. bse Later in the claim that the provincial government was the owner and they could not capture the respondents. Property Fake best advocate from Jehlum lawyer