The West Pakistan Citizens Rental Ordinance 1959, based on the completion of sections 13 (2) (II) and 15 (6), the tenant was evicted under the enforcement of the person when all the tenants were in possession of the house. Was admitted and on different occasions lie took a different stand. This ability of the tenant to take possession of the same evidence clearly shows that he was no longer occupying the land he occupied, but that the sub-tenant was being occupied, not just when he was covered by duties. Was rather moved. In the absence of any proof to prove proof of payment of the rent under the tenant's lease the order of eviction by all the tenant was not sustainable, to be unimaginable. The conclusions of the courts on the issue of below will not be guaranteed. Interference with the second appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
