MUHAMMAD TAYAB versus AKBAR HUSSAIN
Section 14 (2), Arbitration 14 (2), Arbitration Act, 1940 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, which was not filed within the stipulated time for the rule of the Court of Appeal, the party also requested that there be no prior notice of mediation. The proceedings were given by the sole arbitrator. The High Court did not consider the objections that were filed before the stipulated time period. The objections were filed. In the proceedings of the arbitration by the specially taken party, over the stipulated time, the notice was not dealt with, in view of which the Supreme Court set aside the High Court decision in which the award was made the rule of the court. And the case was remanded to the High Court. Examine the record of the arbitration proceedings to determine whether the request made by the party regarding the non-service of notice is justice or which may have occurred without questioning Lemmy. tation
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Kamalia Musa lawyer