TEHMINA MUFTI versus UNIVERSITY OF SINDH, JAMSHORO
Section 40 of the Jammu Karachi Act 1972 [as amended by the Jammu Karachi (Amendment) Ordinance (LV of 1984)] did not apply to the termination of the services of the Appellant before the amendment of Section 40, University of Karachi Act 1972. And before such an amendment it was decided to appeal and review, and the case of the appellant was not covered by the section 40 (amended) section of the Karachi Karachi Act of 1972, even though it is a rule that A constitution grants the right to appeal. This must be interpreted quietly when it does not explicitly provide that the appellant has the right to be heard \ it will apply and in the case of a review provided for in section 40, the Karachi Act, 1972. Can be extended. Not available against any order / decision of the Syndicate under the Syndicate University Act, 1972, other than to be reviewed, the grieving person can be heard in person before being reviewed. The Syndicate was not personally heard before the Appellant in accordance with the terms of section 40, Karachi Karachi Act of 1972, after the notice to the Appellant for hearing of his case. The Syndicate has been sent back for redress [Natural Justice, Principles]
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
