MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus SHAHEEN AIRPORT SERVICES
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 22A (8) (g) Applicants against the Establishment for Closing Applicants for allegedly Inappropriate Wage Processing / Services acting as Porters at Airport Admittedly banned interim stay to prevent them from being denied employment. The central application (against unfair labor practice) showed that the applicants were appointed on different dates as required, meaning they were temporary employees or casual workers and were formally appointed by the Establishment. Wages or salaries were not paid, but porter charges were received from the passengers who hired them. And from which they were paid a proportionate amount. Such workers can be terminated from employment by any tenth. Applicants failed to file unfair labor lawsuit, their interim stay was dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from FR DI Khan lawyer