ADIL KHAN versus MEMBER (REVENUE), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB
Martial Law Regulation 1972 No. 115 Para 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) in plaintiff questions dismissing the plaintiff's case in a pre-trial case on the basis of tenancy rights in the land was dismissed. Was on the board's lack of revenue. The review dismissed the case on the ground that the plaintiff had reduced the court fees. As a result of the plaintiff's constitutional request, the Board of Revenue decided to seek remand of the matter as to whether or not this verification was previously filed with the Limited Board of Revenue, as amended. More than one modification period has been filed. The plaintiff's claim was dismissed, the High Court upheld the plaintiff's request for correctness of the Board of Revenue in the application for leave of appeal, which was that the Board of Revenue decided on a merit request (before remand. ) There is no objection to competing with the defendant in respect of the question. Therefore, the validity of the limitation, if one was effectively excused from filing a review and the plaintiff who succeeded in passing the judgment. In the constitutional jurisdiction for the first time before the High Court, the trial of the merits by the objection raised by the defendant could not be justified.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
