Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus MUNIR NABI KHAN

Law Evidence Order 1984 Arts 2 (1) (c) and 72 Academic Instances meaning that the test is allegedly used for three years the examiner's contention was challenged before a civil court which Had dismissed the appeal against the decision of the Examination Examination Examination. The trial court met the same fate. The scrutiny of the justification shows that the reliance was mainly on the certificate of innocence issued by the examiner's deputy superintendent and an inspector of the test center that any such misconduct was used by such officials. Was not done However, the evidence of the test center was not presented in the evidence in support of the certificate of innocence such The certificates issued by such authorities were of little weight because they were not presented as witnesses to cross-examination. Because it cannot be estimated. Thus the contents of their certificate / innocence certificate can be relied upon upon the circumstances in which the evidence is considered immigration advocates phone number from Gakhar Mandi lawyer