HABIB-UL-WAHAB AL-KHAIRI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Constitution Appointment for the Judgment of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Arts 193 and 1991 High Court Judges The basic requirement of Article 193 of the Constitution is to be a High Court Judge. Not less than ten years, which does not necessarily mean that he / she was a High Court Practice Lawyer for the said term where the High Court Judges were prominent members. Beat Association; There was no evidence that none of those individuals had acted as lawyers in the courts. All such persons were mentioned by the Council in their regular register as Advocate of the High Court which shows that they are registered as such and all such persons practiced in the courts of Pakistan and the Judge. Holds the required height for the elevation. Because the appointed persons have been the Advocates of the High Court and it may be recommended for the appointment of their names to the concerned authorities with the required period as the High Court judges were made according to the constitution for the appointment of such persons. And there was no constitutional clause. This question was violated as to whether some of those persons were practicing High Court Advocates, the fact that under the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution, the High Court Can't determine.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Jhudo lawyer