GHULAM RASOOL versus KHUDA BAKHSH
Challenging such court order under section 68 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), section 12 (2), OXV, R9 and OXLEY, R5 section 12 (2) of the Canal and Drainage Act 1873 Setting a Restriction Order by Court Applicants Both the appeals sought by the CPC, the appointment of a local commissioner and the suspension of the civil court's petitioner were dismissed by the trial court, and the appellate court's position below was correct that the applicants established through important evidence. They cannot necessarily be excluded on the spot. The inspection by the local commissioner and the execution of the civil court order had no benefit when it was already implemented and the canal department took all necessary steps in this regard.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Mandra lawyer