AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR versus SAHIBZADA ISHAQ ZAFAR, EX-SPEAKER AJ&K LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY
Appeal against the order of admission of the Constitutional Petition Act 1974 S, 44, of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir, requires the scrutiny of the facts and legal aspects of the mere question of the constitutional application, the Supreme Court will not interfere with the appeal and Will maintain its operation. After withdrawing primarily, the High Court had to draw conclusions on the facts and disputed issues of law on the basis of the record before them and resolve such points on the basis that there was no real jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in the matter of constitutional petition. Is not an option and thus will be appealed against. The order for admission to the constitutional petition will be made only when the issue is shown in clear violation of the constitutional or other legal provisions on the authentic doctrine and not in the case in which the question of law and facts is deeply and cumbersomely appreciated. You need In the face of jurisdiction or apparent neglect of law, record situations were not called for interference
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
