Guardians and Wards Act 1890 Section 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Minor Constitutional Jurisdiction Cover, Appeal Court's finding of handing over a minor to a maternal grandmother was not a defect so as to interfere with the process. Can be done. The constitutional jurisdiction by the High Court finding of the appellate court was the result of misreading or not reading any evidence The dispute is whether the applicant should be entitled to detain the minor, The verdict was basically a question. An appellate court that is competent to make the same decision on the question of fact made by a competent tribunal / court can only be challenged before the High Court in the constitutional jurisdiction on the grounds that there is no evidence. Or a matter of explaining it. Reading or not reading this false evidence is shocking to the conscience of a sensible man. Otherwise, the definition of evidence such as the Appellate Court was not the work of the High Court whereas in the case the exceptional appellate jurisdiction had to deal with the case.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
