Find a Lawyer

RAMZAN SUGAR MILLS LTD. versus MIAN MIRAJ-UD-DIN

Article 185 (3) of the Companies Ordinance (XLVII of 1984), Articles 265, 264, 263 and 270 of the original petition for leave to appeal against the interim order passed by the High Court not only in civil original applications but also in civil miscellaneous applications. Application for. Inter-State orders were approved under the notice, the petition was postponed pending the High Court's decision for leave to appeal, the facts and relevant law required deep appreciation and the case The clear outcome of the Supreme Court on the merits of the IPC was to prevent non-interference. There is a rule with interim orders of a court of competent jurisdiction, and interference to avoid expressing facts and opinions regarding the law is an exception to the Supreme Court, lest any party's cause be prejudiced. Fall and its possession affects the mind of the court. The matter refuses to interfere with interim orders exercising its discretionary powers under Article 185 (3) of the Constitution. The appeal was denied with the observation that the applicant could appear before the High Court and oppose the formal order there. top civil advocates from Kakur Town lawyer