TRUSTEES OF THE PORT OF KARACHI versus MUHAMMAD SALEEM
Sections 2 (xxviii) and 25 A workman-defined person who was dismissed, discharged, retrieved, left or otherwise removed from the job was not a worker until his dismissal, discharge etc. There was no connection to or result from the industrial dispute, which led to the dismissal, discharge, etc., that caused the dispute in section 2 (xxviii) of the ordinance defining the worker as ordinance section 2 (xxviii). The action under section 25A also applies and the issue of an employee's individual dispute is irrelevant. The Industrial Dispute is not a worker for the purposes of Section 25 read with Section 25 (xxviii) of the Employee Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, not entitled to the treatment provided by Section 25A of the Ordinance.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
