MUHAMMAD SHAFI versus SARDAR BEGUM
The West Pakistan Citizens Rental Restriction Ordinance 1959 Section 13 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 9, the plaintiff's possession of the plaintiff's possession in the home was dependent on the jurisdiction of the plaintiff for the rights of the tenant and civil court evidence. If the defendant becomes a tenant of the landlord's residence on the request of the tenant raised by the defendant, the jurisdiction of the civil court will be terminated = however, no one is allowed to entertain and prosecute the dispute by the civil court. There would be no restriction if the tenant had not received a verbal request from the defendant, there was no document directly or collectively to show the payment of rent in which the rent was received, either by the claimant or the amount of the treasury. I submit, it does not get legal status. As a tenant under oral evidence it cannot be assured and cannot be relied upon to assure that the tenancy matter was not properly settled. The record in support of the unauthorized occupation of the defendant in the house in question was set on record, it was a strong and convincing civil court, therefore, it had the jurisdiction to entertain and prosecute the occupied house.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Warburton lawyer