Find a Lawyer

COMMERCIAL UNION INSURANCE COMPANY versus COLLECTOR, CUSTOMS

Sections 16, 156 (1) and 181 of the Customs Act 1969 and the E * Ports (Control) Act (XXXXX of 1950), Section 3 (1) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Procedure for the disposal of goods and necessary Items already notice to the owner / importer The confiscation of goods, a legal requirement after legal action, the confiscation of legitimate vehicles found without import and legal ownership documents was processed under the Customs Act, 1969, The occupant of such vehicle cannot provide proof of ownership. Vehicle ownership was complained that before passing the confiscation order, despite the knowledge of the seized officer and the officers concerned that the vehicle was stolen and it was in the possession of the person with whom it was seized, No notice was given (legal owner) Applicant before approving the confiscation order, however, is not the original importer of the secured vehicle and subsequently obtained interest It was imported, not entitled to take notice But such notice must be given to the original importer so that the correct position can be ascertained as to the inalienable right of the person to contribute. Judiciary action was taken on the basis of which there was neither a real owner nor even a very good buyer of the vehicle, based on a forged document produced by a third party, a genuine claimant. Was not recovered from or recovered from, inherited from a legal impairment. The confiscation order gave the owner of the goods the right to pay a fine in exchange for confiscating the goods and not to any foreign authority, therefore, in such cases Working under judicial notice and appropriate note to the original owner immigration advocates email from Sehar Baqlas lawyer