Find a Lawyer

AAMAR ARSHAD versus STATE

Section 2 302/3434 Review of Evidence At the relevant time, witnesses in the presence of the witnesses were very skeptical that the bullet recovered from inside the body was not sent to the forensic science laboratory to file an FIR in these cases. The delay was a substantial material prosecution. The location of the blood vessel could not be specified at the location where the victim was allegedly shot and is likely to be unidentified and the attacker could not be denied anonymous escape, according to him. The accused was acquitted. tax advocates from Chitral lawyer