West Pakistan Citizens Rent Restriction Ordinance 1959 Section 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Shop related dispute Although not included in the petitioner's PTO, the applicant was successfully removed. And it was captured. The question was purchased at the auction of the respondents and they were able to obtain possession of the shop through a civil court agency when it was read in conjunction with the legal claim that the applicant was required to comply with the withdrawal order in 1967. There was no right when it came to his knowledge that the underground shop had not been included in his PTO and, on the contrary, he had been lost in all the settlement forums and eventually his constitutional request. The High Court dismissed it in 1965, despite its defeat in all forums. Occupation of this shop for 25 years without any right and rightly imposed a special cost of Rs 5000 on the judgment passed by the High Court High Court does not indicate any defect or legal weakness. Was done
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
