Find a Lawyer

ABDUR RASHID ALIAS MUHAMMAD RASHID versus MUHAMMAD HANIF

Civil Procedure Code Order VI VI Generally O VI, R 17 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Appeal for amendment of your written statement by the plaintiff who amended the trial All the courts, including the court, rejected. And also that the intra-court appeals filed by the High Court for dismissal of the constitutional application and non-interference in the search of the two courts below it were filed seven years later to amend the written statement which It was a late stage and before the evidence could come. The case was registered and the case was adjudicated for argument, were they valid and supported by the amendments to the proposal as stated in the petitioner's knowledge and were readily available I could mention it in a written statement that he did not, and there was no valid reason for him to wait seven years for the first time to tell him about it for the first time. There was no fault or legal weakness. As stated in the High Court verdict to justify interference, the leave to appeal was denied in these circumstances. A. immigration advocates phone number from Haroonabad lawyer