ABDUL RIAZ versus HAMIDAN BEGUM
West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 S, 5 and Schedule: Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Matters relating to non-payment of maintenance for more than two years of marriage. Failure to perform marital duties for more than three years. Minor tyranny was decided in favor of the wife and only in her favor was the decree passed that she would be subject to the return of the land which was gifted to her by her father-in-law. , So the Appellate Court High Court upheld it. In the constitutional jurisdiction, however, while maintaining the decree to dissolve the marriage, the husband is placed on a condition attached to the decree of the return of the property to the High Court, which finds that the family court is caring. On questions related to non-payment of rehabilitation, performing the duties of the marital, deserving of the decree of the wife to dissolve the victim, the marriage was completely unnecessary on the basis of marriage. Such a finding was not reasonably argued nor was there any weakness or legal error, but the land covered, however, was served by its in-laws as per the entries in the marriage contract. The wife was given a gift in exchange for giving and there was no excuse for it. Marriage appeal leave was denied in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Battagram lawyer