KAMRAN INDUSTRY (PVT.) LTD. versus INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN
Banking Companies (Recovery of Loans) Ordinance 1979 Section 6 (4) Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), VIII, R11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the plaintiff for non-disclosure of cause of action bar Discard. In the case filed before the civil judge about the jurisdiction of the civil judge, it was requested to claim that the loan agreement with the defendant (bank) was illegal, ultra-virus and resulted in ineffective influence. And the trial court dismissed the plaintiff on that basis. There was no reason for the trial court's action to quash the trial; the provision of section 6 (4), the Banking Companies (Debt Recovery) Ordinance 1979, was not correct, which matters in the jurisdiction. The jurisdiction of all the courts in relation to these matters has been removed. Under the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts established under the Banking Companies (Recovery of Loans) Ordinance, 1979, the courts established under the Articles of Ordinance may be dismissed under C. L (d) of OI, R 11, CPC, which provides that the plaintiff be dismissed where the suit in the case statement indicates that he is barred by any law, therefore, in the circumstances Declined.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Bunner lawyer