ZUBAIDA KHANUM versus S.A.J. KAZMI
Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 section 15 (2) (vii) and 20 as per the personal requirement of the landlord due to a dispute by the landlord on the basis of personal necessity filed by the tenant, on behalf of the tenant. Resistance to the adjacent shop was earlier locked in the eviction request by the landlord and was not used for the purpose of starting the landlord's business. The landlord was evacuated for saying that the adjoining store that was vacant for residential / commercial purposes was suitable. Used for residential purposes, a spot inspection was filed under section 20 to determine if the shop was vacated by it, but it was being used as a drawing room for residential purposes, The request was not disposed of by the Rent Controller. Regarding the second store that was vacated by the landlord, which may require a site inspection, the tenant's annoyance, the case was remanded in the direction that the rent controller did the first site inspection. And then pass the necessary and appropriate order.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Barkhan lawyer