LAKHEY KHAN versus A.C./D.C./ADDITIONAL SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER
Section 10 and 11 of the Land Settlement Act 1958 Allotment of Land Allotment voluntarily applied for the cancellation of the allotted land in excess of its entitlement so as to retain any particular land. This choice could be used and the additional name was removed from the original name. Alloty, but not to his liking and such cancellation was allotted to other persons. Real Altey insisted on exercising his liking, the Authority canceled the allotment of other allotments in relation to the additional area and Restored the original allottee on the basis of its choice. The one who occupied the disputed land, was required by law to exercise his choice, and the other persons whose names were canceled had no valid claim, which is why the first allottee was actually allotted. Was in the same ownership and the Authority did not cancel the land pursuant to its Order RR despite its request that the original allotment could not be interfered with the ownership of the land in dispute because it was not denied or illegal in any way. Is
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
