ABDUL RASHID MANI versus ADDITIONAL SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER
Homelessness (Land Settlement) Act 1958 Section 10/11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Land Allotment Constitutional Jurisdiction, the use of land in conflict which was allotted to the forest and which was in the possession of the Forest Department Was allotted. The sale / seller allotment to the applicants was canceled on the solicitation request and the vendors challenged the cancellation order, which was allotted to the forest in dispute and the department was in possession of the forest and never in possession of the original allottee. No, it could be this: The land allotment in the dispute was canceled by the authorities concerned regarding the cancellation and initial cancellation, and the shopkeeper was not entitled to retain the land in the dispute because it The jurisdiction of the Department is in the forest whether it is the provisions of Sections 10 and 11 of the Act under which this allotment Was. The cancellation, not properly implemented, still could not be ruled out, provided the risk was exercised in exercising the Constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court, which was arbitrary in nature and to help maintain illegal profits. Could not be used for the purposes by which the authorities' allotments could, to a large extent, be legal, fair and in accordance with the law. By the High Court in exercising constitutional jurisdiction
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
