TAJ COMPANY LTD. versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS
The Customs Act 1969 Sections 179, 193 and 196 Companies Ordinance (XLVII of 1984), section 290, is a sale of machinery by a public auction to a subsidiary of a company whose management is supervised by the court for the accuracy of machinery. Was gone The customs authorities were not sustainable in the law because the administration of the company on which the bid was accepted was handed over to the Board of Administrators by the High Court, nor was any reference to such action taken by the customs authorities to the Board of Directors. To the Administrator. Nor did the High Court guarantee the auction, the process of putting machinery in the auction for sale without any auction, was auctioned and the bid was declared illegal and unauthorized. Was. The pending machinery, which was sealed in the defendant's premises, was directed to recover the appropriate inventory in the presence of cancer agents by collector customs and payment of necessary dues will be issued to the applicant company. ?
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Dinga lawyer