ABDUL RAZAQ versus DISTRICT COUNCIL, PESHAWAR
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199 The exercise of the constitutional jurisdiction of the Petitioner, who himself confessed that he had signed the terms and conditions of the lease agreement, alleged that the terms and conditions were soon after the auction was approved. They were asked to sign, which is why they were signed without reading the same controversial question when the terms and conditions of the lease agreement were signed by the applicant, in the constitutional application before or after the auction was accepted. Could not have been done even if the applicant had expanded to contract with the respondent's authority. Under the terms and conditions, in the absence of a violation of any of the laws, any dispute arising from such agreement was not enforceable for constitutional jurisdiction, especially when the terms and conditions of the agreement were specifically Present the dispute arising from the parties to the lease agreement, resolved through arbitration which was reasonable and permanent ate the available remedy for the applicant
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Hattar lawyer