versus
Representing Section 12 (2) of the Public Act 1976 [as represented by the Public (Amendment Ordinance (XVI of 1993))] Election Petition could not prove the default in payment of bank loan of the specified amount by the returning candidate. Returning Candidate has concerns from any bank, financial institution, co-operative society or corporate body in his own name or in the name of his spouse or dependency or any business that was primarily owned by him and is a Has been unpaid for more than a year. No evidence was written to the record from the due date or any such loan was written in writing that any loan was taken by the returning candidate in the name of his minor son record, however, It was revealed that a third person acting as a legal guardian had obtained a loan. Even if such loan is attributed to a returning candidate in the name of a retired candidate's minor son, such a loan would not be less than the prescribed limit for the prosecution and disqualification of corruption. Section 12 (2) (as amended), repeal it under the Public Representation Act 1976
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Upper Deval lawyer