Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus MUHAMMAD YAR

Applicants for the consolidation of Articles 10 (3) and 13 Holdings of the West Pakistan Holding Ordinance 1960 challenged the unanimous order of the relevant authorities according to which their pre-owned and already existing Kanla houses. In which they built residential houses and cattle sheds. In the process of consolidation, the defendants have been allocated that the applicant claiming the preferential right to the division of the land on the basis of their ownership and occupation has claimed and proved that the land in the dispute has been deferred. Part in which the defendants were not at all involved. The defendants had no access to the record at all because of their allegedly superior rights to add land to the dispute in Wanda, not only the residential construction on the land in dispute by the applicants, but also the revenue records and the patwari. Spot inspection proved that several respected individuals, including Lombard, confirmed that the AR and the Vice-Chairmen of the Union Council Stability Authorities and Courts below had to completely ignore that the land had changed their role in the dispute, And now it was no longer agricultural in nature, as a result of such land consolidation Anh had to be made and was responsible for allocating it. Owners occupying these structures, assigning such land to the respondents, was invalid and unacceptable for the proceedings of stability. The order of the courts was set aside and after the determination of the parties' preferential right in the matter, The decision was made to redraw the decision. Of land in conflict advocates from Thul lawyer