Find a Lawyer

SIKANDAR ABDUL KARIM versus STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 (2) Contempt Code (XLV of 1860), Section 409/420/468/471/34 Corruption Act (11 of 1947), Section 5 (2) Guarantee, Defendant's Grant FIR of Government Employees of Section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 was not attracted; it shows that no offense was committed under Section 409, PPC, not prosecution. It has been shown that the accused has committed some fraud for the purpose of fraud. Or used as a forged document to bring his case under sections 420, 468 and 471, PPC. Even though none of these offenses was subject to the prohibited clause of section 497 (1), the CRPC prosecution case was primarily based on documentary evidence. Legal proceedings and tampering by the accused were not possible; the investigating agency showed instability as more than one FI was lodged against the accused in connection with the obligations of the same contract, no reasonable basis. do not have. ex, was present to believe that the accused was guilty of the crime with which he was charged and further inquiry was required in this case the accused was admitted on bail accordingly. law firms from Ziarat lawyer