Find a Lawyer

SALAH-UD-DIN RASHID versus UNIVERSITY OF PUNJAB

Section 35 and 15 (3) of the University of Punjab Act 1973 questions the procedure for approving the affiliation of an educational institution by the University, which examines in favor of the candidates who are directly affiliated with the matter. Which requires immediate attention. Under section 15 (3) of the Jammu Punjab Act 1973, the request for an affidavit by the Vice-Chancellor was unthinkable that the Vice-Chancellor may approve any order which would be interim or interim in nature but the affiliation refuses or approves. The final decision to give must be made. After applying their mind to the facts and requirements of Section 35 (1) of the Act through the Syndicate, it was a recommendation of an affiliated committee grant to provide the applicant with a hearing, a condition for which to practice Was not The jurisdiction of the Syndicate and such hearing of the Vice-Chancellor shall not meet the requirements of the law. In the article of section 35 (4), Proviso, Punjab Act, 1973, Snicket rejected the petition on the recommendation of the Vice-Chancellor and did not grant the applicant a hearing, declaring the action taken by the syndicate. went. Without legal authority and no legal effect by the High Court and after giving the applicant the opportunity to represent against the proposed decision, the matter was referred to the syndicate for judgment. list of supreme court advocates from Jaja Abasian lawyer