WAQAR HUSSAIN SHAH versus THE STATE THROUGH ADVOCATE-GENERAL AJ&K
Sections 497 (2) and 103 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Prohibition Law (Enforcement Head of 1985), Sections 3 and 4 are the owners of the bail-out, the non-attendance of private witnesses in the Prohibition Clause during the grant inquiry proceedings. Does not come According to Section 497, the CC Chemical Examiner's report was not available. The criminal charges against the accused were not criminal in the sense that he had 81 bottles of alcohol, which he had kept in the garage, No person was cited in the area during that time. The recovery process, and the police under Section 103, CRPC, mandated two members of the public to be involved in the recovery process unless the prosecution could show that it was not possible to do so under the circumstances. CCP police allege that no explanation was given by the prosecutor in this case, but it also stated that the sentence provided for the offense does not fall within the prohibited clause of section 497. Initially 81 bottles of alcohol were recovered, but only one bottle containing 10 ml from each bottle was sent for chemical testing; a chemical tester's report has not been received so far, so it is not yet established. Determine whether the seized material was alcohol. Was complete and no further investigation was required for the accused, no previous FIR or punishment order was available against the accused on record. The case was one of further investigation and the accused was granted bail in the circumstances. had gone
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
