Find a Lawyer

ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN versus MASOOD AHMAD KHAN

The relevant evidence in the books of the Law Evidence Order 1984 Article 48 accounts were regularly related entries in the books of accounts held during the business, however, such entries were liable to be charged by the plaintiff (bank) to an individual. Were not enough for them. The defendants testified until 1974 75 and this fact was also confirmed by a senior bank executive who also acknowledged that the bank was obligated to withhold interest payments from April 1975 and made interest. Overconfidence and lying in the accounts proved that the bank failed to claim the money, and in the dispute the bank failed to provide evidence about the accuracy of its accounts, and speculation was that the evidence might be available. Were not presented, if presented, the same person would be ineligible with the plaintiff in which he withheld the defendant who submitted The statement of accounts stated was beyond any doubt. The bank was inaccurate and inaccurate and the defendant had already paid the outstanding balance, thus, the bank was not entitled to recover the claimed amount. power of attorney advocate Nawab Shah lawyer