SHER MUHAMMAD versus DARUL ULOOM USMANIA
West Pakistan Urban Rental Restriction Ordinance 1959 Section 13 Application for Removal of Tenant Ground for Evacuation As stated in the eviction request, there was a contradiction with its evidence in support of the eviction effect in clear terms. There must be a clear exemption, which was a damaged cover for that purpose. Needed to be evacuated so that the tenant had notice of the land for their eviction and accordingly the need for saving in the eviction application was that the property was needed to establish a madrassa, while in evidence it was It was said that he needed it too. The residence of the students of the madrassa If the evacuation application requested that the property be used for residential purpose, the tenant could provide proof that the residence in the madrassa was already occupied by the landlord. For the purpose, the landlord also made contradictory requests in the eviction petition and was not entitled to claim evidence. The tenant's appeal court's decision to dismiss the tenant's dismissal order was set aside while the rent controller. These conditions were reinstated by rejecting the KG's removal request.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Hangu lawyer