MATEEN AHMAD versus STATE
West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 Section 13 Criminal Code (v. 1898), 5 103 The place of recovery of evidence was not owned by anyone else nor was the owner of the said property. Neither a respectable person from the eligible area was involved in the recovery process despite information from the detective, the police officer (recovery witness) was not only a party to the matter, but also a prosecutor, investigator and a witness. Therefore, he was interested in the results. In these circumstances external witnesses must have had the evidence of the prosecution, thus, there was no intrinsic value, which resulted in the acquittal of the accused
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Domeli lawyer
